بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

Pada topik sebelumnya penulis telah mengambil topik mengenai Umm Qirfa dilihat dari referensi sirah nabawiyah dalam teks asli yang dijadikan landasan antek FFI yang telah terbukti bahwa sumber yang mereka pakai adalah palsu (maudhu).

Pada pembahasan kali ini penulis ingin sedikit mengupas tuduhan-tuduhan dari artikel yang mereka pakai. Sebagai informasi bagi pembaca bahwa pembunuhan Umm Qirfa telah di komik-kan dan seperti biasa komik-komik tersebut dibumbui plintiran-pintiran hadist.Naudzubiahhimin dzalik

Sebelum membahas ini lebih jauh mungkin pembaca ingin mengetahui siapakah Umm Qirfa tersebut? Bagaimana peristiwa tersebut? Kenapa namanya menjadi topik pembicaraan yang hangat? Mari kita sedikit mereview siapakah Umm Qirfa tersebut.

Penyerangan Terhadap Umm Qirfa dari Bani Fazarah oleh Zayd b. Haritha – January, 628M
Ward bin Amr bin Madash, salah seorang B. Sa’d bin Hudayil, telah dibunuh oleh salah seorang dari bani Badr (yang namanya Sa’d bin Hudail). Ketika Zay bersumpah bahwa dia tidak akan pernah wudlu sampai bisa menguasai Banu Fazarah. Dan ketika dia sembuh dari lukanya nabi mengirim dia memerangi mereka bersama sebuah pasukan. Dia menawan Umm Qirfa (nama sebenarnya adalah Fatimah bt. Rabiah b. Badr), istri dari Malik b. Hudhayfah, ketua suku B. Fazarah, sebagai tawanan dan anak perempuannya serta Abdullah bin Mas’ada juga di tawan. Zayd Qays b. Mohsin untuk membunuh Umm Qirfa Qays mengikat kedua kakinya dengan tali dan mengikatkan tali-tali pada dua unta. Dia lalu memacu unta-unta ke dua arah berlawanan sehingga membelah tubuhUmm Qirfa menjadi dua. [Ibn Ishak, pp.664-665]

Sumber dari tabari mengatakan bahwa sang Eksekutor tersebut ditunjuk oleh Zayd. Yang perlu kita garis bawahi dalam kasus ini adalah tidak ada sumber yang mengatakan bahwa Nabi Muhammad SAW mengetahui peristiwa tersebut sehingga Beliau tidak berkomentar apapun.  Namun seandainya saja berita serupa sampai ke Rasulullah SAW maka pasti ada pelurusan dari beliau. Kita ambil contoh pada kasus lain seperti kasus pembunuhan tawanan oleh Khalid yang pada saat kemudia Rasulullah SAW mengutus Ali untuk meluruskannya.

Muhammad ibn Ishaq, The Life of the Prophet
Khalid’s expedition after the conquest of Makkah to the B. Jadhima of Kinana and Ali’s expedition to repair Khalid’s error.

Hakim told me that the Apostle summoned Ali and told him to go to these people and look into the affair, and abolish the practices of the pagan era. So Ali went to them with the money the Apostle had sent and paid the bloodwit and made good their monetary loss. When all blood and property had been paid for he still had some money left over. He asked if any compensation was still due and when they said it was not, he gave them the rest of the money on behalf of the Apostle. Then he returned and reported to the Apostle what he had done and he commended him. Then the Apostle arose and facing the Qibla, raised his arms, and said: O God! I am innocent before Thee of what Khalid has done. This he did thrice. Khalid and Abdur Rahman b. Auf had sharp words about this matter. The latter said to him: “You have done a pagan act in Islam.” Khalid said that he had only avenged Abdur Rahman’s father. He answered that he was a liar because he himself had killed his father’s slayer; but Khalid had taken vengeance for his uncle so that there was bad feeling between them. Hearing of this the Apostle said (to Khalid): “Leave my companions alone, for by God if you had a mountain of gold and spent it for God’s sake, you would not approach the merit of my companions.”

Imam Bukhari juga mencatat hal yang serupa
Sahih Bukhari, Volumn 005, Book 059, Hadith Number 628.
Narated By Salim’s father: The Prophet sent Khalid bin Al-Walid to the tribe of Jadhima and Khalid invited them to Islam but they could not express themselves by saying, “Aslamna (i.e. we have embraced Islam),” but they started saying “Saba’na! Saba’na (i.e. we have come out of one religion to another).” Khalid kept on killing (some of) them and taking (some of) them as captives and gave every one of us his Captive. When there came the day then Khalid ordered that each man (i.e. Muslim soldier) should kill his captive, I said, “By Allah, I will not kill my captive, and none of my companions will kill his captive.” When we reached the Prophet, we mentioned to him the whole story. On that, the Prophet raised both his hands and said twice, “O Allah! I am free from what Khalid has done.”
Dari kisah di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa jika Rasulullah SAW mengetahui telah terjadi penyimpangan yang dilakukan oleh tentara Muslim, maka pasti beliau akan segera meluruskannya. Namun sampai sekarang para penghujat islam selalu memakai adagium “sikap Muslim adalah sikap muhammad” atau "perilaku Muslim adalah perilaku Muhammad", demikian pula asumsi mereka tentang kisah Pembunuhan Ummu Qirfa. Namun ada sedikit pertanyaan yang menuntut pembuktian dan fakta sejarah yang hingga kini belum dapat dijawab oleh para kafir penghujat tersebut, yakni Apa hak Zayd mengeksekusi Ummu Qirfa? Bukankah Komandan pertempuran tsb adalah Abu Bakar? Bagaimana mungkin eksekusi sedahsyat itu bukan diputuskan oleh Komandan perang?
Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4345:
It has been narrated on the authority of Salama (b. al-Akwa’) who said: We fought against the Fazara and Abu Bakr was the commander over us. He had been appointed by the Messenger oi Allah (may peace be upon him). When we were onlv at an hour’s distance from the water of the enemy, Abu Bakr ordered us to attack. We made a halt during the last part of the night tor rest and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought. Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along. Among them was a woman from Banu Fazara. She was wearing a leather coat. With her was her daughter who was one of the prettiest girls in Arabia. I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: Give me that girl, O Salama. I said: Messenger of Allah, she has fascinated me. I had not yet disrobed her. When on the next day. the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) ag;tin met me in the street, he said: O Salama, give me that girl, may God bless your father. I said: She is for you. Messenger of Allah! By Allah. I have not yet disrobed her. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent her to the people of Mecca, and surrendered her as ransom for a number of Muslims who had been kept as prisoners at Mecca [Muslim no. 4345]
Tidak ada bukti yang mengindikasikan Rasulullah SAW mengetahui peristiwa tersebut. Andaikata hal tersebut adalah sebuah tindak eksekusi sekalipun, bukankah sudah jelas perintah dan Hukum Perang Islam bahwa tawanan perang tidak boleh dibunuh?
Pertanyaan-pertanyaan diatas sudah ditanyakan kepada para kafir penghujat. Tapi bukan jawaban pasti yang kami dapatkan, melainkan hanya komentar-komentar yang bersifat asumsi serta argumen berbasis menduga-duga plus ocehan dan hujatan yang sama sekali jauh dari harapan.

Demikianlah sedikit pembahasan mengenai Umm Qirfa, sekiranya dapat berguna bagi kita semua.